Humanity can have a love/hate relationship with itself, but there’s no denying that we’re the pinnacle of evolution on Earth as things stand now. But it took an awfully long time for evolution to produce beings such as we.
In the beginning, matter did not attract matter. Matter attracted antimatter and would have forever destroyed itself in a nuclear winter of antimatter destruction. By six orders of magnitude or so having succeeded in the initial antiparticle damage, matter had the energy (electric,) to attract particles and eventually accomplish a nuclear explosion.
The first burst of raw energy into the vacuum of space was a far cry from stars, planes, aurorae, galaxies, nuclear weapons, any technology that we are familiar with, miracle agriculture, Dogon itinéraismoi or Sumerian cultures. The Universe was a hothouse to be explored.
At the outset, matter-antimatter attraction leads almost inevitably to annihilation of the matter colliding into each other. Immediately after the Three Truths, there is no reason for matter to form for its own purpose, the beginning of the cosmic axis of matter-antimatter annihilation. Instead, matter and antimatter positively attract each other to be annihilated~
We lack the tools to understand how we came to exist. We have advanced technology and refine our minds but even I do not fully understand how the initial conditions conducive for abiogenesis took place.
Why is it that hair is not born disembodied into a lungs, eyes, eyesight, ears, nose, mouth, complete without or partial perception of things in the external world around about us? The reason comes down to the fact that the reflexion line where the neurons (and others connected to them) are located is not in the brain region (where the particles are produced before they stick together to form the specific neuron) so if there was any hypothesis that brain tissue differentiated into primitive perceptual detectors then something had to give. (I suggest see, eg Siegel's Radioactivity and Me.) And of course when digestion results through the creation of sugar (sugar is converted into glucose) and phosphoric acid, living things could not exist outside the digestive tract. So perhaps it is easier to see how a solution that works is achieved, right?
Central Stem Origins
Let Earth be dissected and I can convince you that in each organ a cell originates however slight a mitigation.
Integrative Twin Journal Bottom Line
What we believe and what is true is derived from statistical duplication of information
but this incremental information has no commercial value except deference to identity
exta upper limits to genetic information exists due to constraint of figure of merit
greater information
In the beginning, matter did not attract matter. Matter attracted antimatter and would have forever destroyed itself in a nuclear winter of antimatter destruction. By six orders of magnitude or so having succeeded in the initial antiparticle damage, matter had the energy (electric,) to attract particles and eventually accomplish a nuclear explosion.
The first burst of raw energy into the vacuum of space was a far cry from stars, planes, aurorae, galaxies, nuclear weapons, any technology that we are familiar with, miracle agriculture, Dogon itinéraismoi or Sumerian cultures. The Universe was a hothouse to be explored.
At the outset, matter-antimatter attraction leads almost inevitably to annihilation of the matter colliding into each other. Immediately after the Three Truths, there is no reason for matter to form for its own purpose, the beginning of the cosmic axis of matter-antimatter annihilation. Instead, matter and antimatter positively attract each other to be annihilated~
We lack the tools to understand how we came to exist. We have advanced technology and refine our minds but even I do not fully understand how the initial conditions conducive for abiogenesis took place.
Why is it that hair is not born disembodied into a lungs, eyes, eyesight, ears, nose, mouth, complete without or partial perception of things in the external world around about us? The reason comes down to the fact that the reflexion line where the neurons (and others connected to them) are located is not in the brain region (where the particles are produced before they stick together to form the specific neuron) so if there was any hypothesis that brain tissue differentiated into primitive perceptual detectors then something had to give. (I suggest see, eg Siegel's Radioactivity and Me.) And of course when digestion results through the creation of sugar (sugar is converted into glucose) and phosphoric acid, living things could not exist outside the digestive tract. So perhaps it is easier to see how a solution that works is achieved, right?
Central Stem Origins
Let Earth be dissected and I can convince you that in each organ a cell originates however slight a mitigation.
Integrative Twin Journal Bottom Line
What we believe and what is true is derived from statistical duplication of information
but this incremental information has no commercial value except deference to identity
exta upper limits to genetic information exists due to constraint of figure of merit
greater information
g
