Last week, Apple announced the launch of its Find My network accessory program, allowing compatible third-party accessories to be tracked in the Find My app right alongside Apple devices. The first products that work with the Find My app will include the new Chipolo item tracker, new Belkin earbuds, and two electric bikes from VanMoof. While they aren't available as publicly as other Apple peripherals, everything is receiving third-party support in Apple's hard-working Find My....
In DC we have maybe the biggest fly-by of the season versus top burgeoning BG at the position.
End issue of "People's Champion. #14 Politics Van Sant 2/8" — Stan Kirman (@StanMRK) January 8, 2016
If you were living under a rock earlier this year, the lobbying for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to be sworn into office on January 20, didn't play out very much inside DC politics. Then on the first Friday after our nation's birthday and literally directly before we all celebrated what would have been Ronald Reagan's 100th anniversaire — Foreign Policy rolled out the cover.
It's an editorial article by Jim Fallows and Michael Crowley: "The Fight for Hillary Clinton." Its title makes it sound like foreign policy analysts had a vision of an election-year Obama and one that has nothing to do with staffing and current events, but as usual seems a bit more about ideology than substance. New DC interns come to Washington angry with Obama, and most staffers understand that super-PACs and other outside organizations shake up the still delicate equilibrium in Washington and make candidates look as if they have an edge the rest of the time.
But the article shades in pro-Hillary details as if they were hot tips within the Obama campaign. For example, the business-class passion for Hillary is supported by a Democracy Alliance newsletter just a few months ago — no scandal here! If the piece is clicking nobody should be surprised. When authors of papers about foreign policy tend to focus on foreign business interests like if they came from a cardboard box, and say nothing of the actual stories with actual votes (bubble coppers, allegiance mechanic, etc), they clearly have their vision twisted by their own radical pro-Hillary visuals.
Back to the actual content of their article. If you're not familiar with DC skewers that are designed to dent foreign policy wisdom legs — they often slip them by as a way to help advance friends and causes. You could read one every week of the year.
For instance, the piece talks about Warren Blair. Starting out his career as a well-heeled consultant running on the "Warren Buffet" slogan in Senate races across the country before his eventual rise to run Warren with money from Goldman Sachs, Blair was an innovator within DC policy circles. By 2004, his savvy as
In DC we have maybe the biggest fly-by of the season versus top burgeoning BG at the position.
End issue of "People's Champion. #14 Politics Van Sant 2/8" — Stan Kirman (@StanMRK) January 8, 2016
If you were living under a rock earlier this year, the lobbying for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to be sworn into office on January 20, didn't play out very much inside DC politics. Then on the first Friday after our nation's birthday and literally directly before we all celebrated what would have been Ronald Reagan's 100th anniversaire — Foreign Policy rolled out the cover.
It's an editorial article by Jim Fallows and Michael Crowley: "The Fight for Hillary Clinton." Its title makes it sound like foreign policy analysts had a vision of an election-year Obama and one that has nothing to do with staffing and current events, but as usual seems a bit more about ideology than substance. New DC interns come to Washington angry with Obama, and most staffers understand that super-PACs and other outside organizations shake up the still delicate equilibrium in Washington and make candidates look as if they have an edge the rest of the time.
But the article shades in pro-Hillary details as if they were hot tips within the Obama campaign. For example, the business-class passion for Hillary is supported by a Democracy Alliance newsletter just a few months ago — no scandal here! If the piece is clicking nobody should be surprised. When authors of papers about foreign policy tend to focus on foreign business interests like if they came from a cardboard box, and say nothing of the actual stories with actual votes (bubble coppers, allegiance mechanic, etc), they clearly have their vision twisted by their own radical pro-Hillary visuals.
Back to the actual content of their article. If you're not familiar with DC skewers that are designed to dent foreign policy wisdom legs — they often slip them by as a way to help advance friends and causes. You could read one every week of the year.
For instance, the piece talks about Warren Blair. Starting out his career as a well-heeled consultant running on the "Warren Buffet" slogan in Senate races across the country before his eventual rise to run Warren with money from Goldman Sachs, Blair was an innovator within DC policy circles. By 2004, his savvy as
g
